Key ideas

A collection of short reports from a workshop in 2011 on the future of publishing

Things to check out

  • The Open Citations Corpus (http://opencitations.net/) contains references to 3.4 million biomedical papers, representing 20% of all PubMed Central papers published between 1950 and 2010, and including all the highly cited papers in every biomedical field.
  • SciVerse from Elsevier
  • “Executable journals”
    • It will help us do science-on-demand (“press this button to re-run your thesis”), and equally the papers can process new data autonomously, generating new results which in turn get processed by other papers.
    • You’ll receive an email notification when the paper you wrote five years ago is re-run with new inputs from other people’s papers, and so will the people who used yours.

Tools and technologies

Lifecycle of digital artefact

  • Registration
  • Certification
  • Archiving
  • Rewarding
  • Enactment of the Digital Artefact: presentations, videos
  • Writing
  • Discoursing
  • Reuse/reproduceable
  • Formal/informal
  • Granularity of publications

List of main tools

  • Literature programming 2
  • Scientific publication 3
  • Spreadsheets 4
  • Reference management system 5
  • Web pages + Web sites 6
  • Powerpoint 7
  • Word/LaTeX Google docs 8
  • Supercomputing 9
  • Gmail 10
  • Digital library p
  • Poster 12
  • Analysis workflow + R scripts, codes 13
  • Amazon for papers/books 14
  • Catalogues: s/w library, N/F, Yellow pages 15
  • YouTube 16
  • Recordings/broadcast/webinars of talks and presentations 17
  • Dropbox/SlideShare/Flickr/Twitter 18
  • Terminologies, thesauri, mapping, ontology 19
  • Search services 20
  • Analytical tools to survey the landscape, understand the science landscape, i.e mapping and research literature mapping (Compendium, Cohere, knowledge mapping tools) 21
  • Technologies thesauri 22
  • Hubs for communication: centres of communities (automated versions of it) 23
  • What are the more formal tools 24
  • EasyChair: Conference reviewing tools 25
  • Journals 26
  • Grant repositories/applications: generating documents 27
  • Database schema, data repositories 28
  • Google+, Facebook, social networks 29
  • Learned society 30
  • Conference call (Skype) 31
  • Publishers 32
  • Chat 33
  • Directories of WhoIs/yellow pages

What are the properties necessary to move a tool from formal to informal tool for scientific communication/publishing?

  • Citeability 2
  • Preservation 3
  • Highly shareable 4
  • Known provenance 5
  • Trustable 6
  • Accessibility 7
  • Stability 8
  • Granularity 9
  • Cost (or lack of it) 10
  • Speed 11
  • IP restrictions 12
  • Inherent rewardability 13
  • Annotatabilility 14
  • Protectability 15
  • Staking claims 16
  • Portability 17
  • Palpability 18
  • Easiness 19
  • Capacity 20
  • Multimediality

Categories of tools that are emerging

  • Communication Instant Discourse 2
  • Training tools 3
  • Document composition, editing, authoring 4
  • Sensemaking 5
  • Scientific publication/research sharing 6
  • Preservation/storage 7
  • Presentation 8
  • Search tools 9
  • Digital artefact/ file sharing 10
  • Terminology services 11
  • Curation: metadata/indexing/ managing tools 12
  • Social 13
  • Certification tools and commenting 14
  • Execution tools