Table of Contents
Key ideas
A collection of short reports from a workshop in 2011 on the future of publishing
Things to check out
- The Open Citations Corpus (http://opencitations.net/) contains references to 3.4 million biomedical papers, representing 20% of all PubMed Central papers published between 1950 and 2010, and including all the highly cited papers in every biomedical field.
- SciVerse from Elsevier
- “Executable journals”
- It will help us do science-on-demand (“press this button to re-run your thesis”), and equally the papers can process new data autonomously, generating new results which in turn get processed by other papers.
- You’ll receive an email notification when the paper you wrote five years ago is re-run with new inputs from other people’s papers, and so will the people who used yours.
Tools and technologies
Lifecycle of digital artefact
- Registration
- Certification
- Archiving
- Rewarding
- Enactment of the Digital Artefact: presentations, videos
- Writing
- Discoursing
- Reuse/reproduceable
- Formal/informal
- Granularity of publications
List of main tools
- Literature programming 2
- Scientific publication 3
- Spreadsheets 4
- Reference management system 5
- Web pages + Web sites 6
- Powerpoint 7
- Word/LaTeX Google docs 8
- Supercomputing 9
- Gmail 10
- Digital library p
- Poster 12
- Analysis workflow + R scripts, codes 13
- Amazon for papers/books 14
- Catalogues: s/w library, N/F, Yellow pages 15
- YouTube 16
- Recordings/broadcast/webinars of talks and presentations 17
- Dropbox/SlideShare/Flickr/Twitter 18
- Terminologies, thesauri, mapping, ontology 19
- Search services 20
- Analytical tools to survey the landscape, understand the science landscape, i.e mapping and research literature mapping (Compendium, Cohere, knowledge mapping tools) 21
- Technologies thesauri 22
- Hubs for communication: centres of communities (automated versions of it) 23
- What are the more formal tools 24
- EasyChair: Conference reviewing tools 25
- Journals 26
- Grant repositories/applications: generating documents 27
- Database schema, data repositories 28
- Google+, Facebook, social networks 29
- Learned society 30
- Conference call (Skype) 31
- Publishers 32
- Chat 33
- Directories of WhoIs/yellow pages
What are the properties necessary to move a tool from formal to informal tool for scientific communication/publishing?
- Citeability 2
- Preservation 3
- Highly shareable 4
- Known provenance 5
- Trustable 6
- Accessibility 7
- Stability 8
- Granularity 9
- Cost (or lack of it) 10
- Speed 11
- IP restrictions 12
- Inherent rewardability 13
- Annotatabilility 14
- Protectability 15
- Staking claims 16
- Portability 17
- Palpability 18
- Easiness 19
- Capacity 20
- Multimediality
Categories of tools that are emerging
- Communication Instant Discourse 2
- Training tools 3
- Document composition, editing, authoring 4
- Sensemaking 5
- Scientific publication/research sharing 6
- Preservation/storage 7
- Presentation 8
- Search tools 9
- Digital artefact/ file sharing 10
- Terminology services 11
- Curation: metadata/indexing/ managing tools 12
- Social 13
- Certification tools and commenting 14
- Execution tools