Key ideas
This paper was discussed in Clare Brett's research group Feb 14, 2011
The paper criticizes facile use of neuroscience to inform teaching strategies, highlighting three fallacies:
- Critical periods
- yes, some things are learnt more easily when kids are young, but other things are better learnt when they are older, such as critical thinking
- it is possible to learn to read etc in adulthood as well
- Brain-based education
- “growing dendrites” - but is number of dendrites the right measure of learning?
- number of connections between synapses better measurement - seems to be strenghtened by memorization, rather than constructivist approaches
- both halves are used at the same time, impossible to target one half
- Learning styles
- is it always good to teach to kids strengths? kids need to challenge their weaknesses