| buckinghamshum1994argumentation | Buckingham Shum, S., & Hammond, N. (1994). Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(4), 603–652. Citeseer. | PDF |
| scaife1996external | Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work?. International journal of human-computer studies, 45(2), 185–213. Elsevier. | PDF |
| shipman1999formality | Shipman, F. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1999). Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(4), 333–352. Springer. | PDF |
| conklin2001facilitated | Conklin, J., Selvin, A. M., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sierhuis, M. (2001). Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. | PDF |
| vanbruggen2002external | Bruggen, J. M. van, Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138. Elsevier. | PDF |
| buckinghamshum2003roots | Buckingham Shum, S. (2003). The roots of computer supported argument visualization. In (3–24). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=779331.779333. | PDF |
| anderson2005study | Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., Prince, C., Su, J., Videon, F., & Wolfman, S. (2005). A study of diagrammatic ink in lecture. Computers \& Graphics, 29(4), 480–489. Elsevier. | |
| lee2005effects | Lee, M., & Kim, D. (2005). The effects of the collaborative representation supporting tool on problem-solving processes and outcomes in web-based collaborative problem-based learning (PBL) environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 273. | PDF |
| buckinghamshum2006hypermedia | Buckingham Shum, S., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Haley, C. B., & Nuseibeh, B. (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from {gIBIS} and {QOC}. (A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik & B. Paech, Eds., , Tran.)Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer Verlag. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/3032/. | PDF |
| slof2010design | Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–20. Springer. | PDF |
| liddo2010cohere | Liddo, A. D., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2010, February). Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/19554/. | PDF |
| bell1997using | Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning. | PDF |
| soller2001comprehensive | Soller, A. (2001). Comprehensive Exam. | PDF |
| brna2001learning | Brna, P., Cox, R., & Good, J. (2001). Learning to think and communicate with diagrams: 14 questions to consider. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1), 115–134. Springer. | PDF |
| fischer2002facilitating | Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Facilitating knowledge convergence in videoconferencing environments: the role of external representation tools. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, CSCL '02. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/citation.cfm?id=1658616.1658754. | PDF |
| scardamalia2003knowledge | Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge Society Network {(KSN):} Toward an expert society for democratizing knowledge. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 63–66. | |
| janssen2005effects | Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., & Broeken, M. (2005). Effects of visualizing participation in computer-supported collaborative learning. | PDF |
| reimann2005adaptive | Reimann, P., Judy, K., Yacef, K., & Goodyear, P. (2005). Adaptive visualisation support for self-managed learning groups. AIED 2005–Workshop 6 Representing and Analyzing Collaborative Interactions: What works? When does it work? To what extent are methods re-usable?. | PDF |
| andriessen2006arguing | Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), (Tran.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge University Press. | PDF |
| rbeiz2006semantic | Rbeiz, M. A. (2006). Semantic representation of digital ink in the classroom learning partner. | |
| dwyer2007incorporating | Dwyer, N. (2007). Incorporating indexicality and contingency into the design of representations for computer-mediated collaboration. | PDF |
| reed2007recent | Reed, C., & Grasso, F. (2007). Recent advances in computational models of natural argument. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(1), 1–15. Wiley Online Library. | PDF |
| stasko2008jigsaw | Stasko, J., Görg, C., & Liu, Z. (2008). Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7(2), 118–132. Nature Publishing Group. | PDF |
| yi2008understanding | Yi, J. S., Kang, Y., Stasko, J. T., & Jacko, J. A. (2008). Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization?. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization. | PDF |
| cakir2009organization | Cakir, M. P. (2009). The Organization of Graphical, Narrative and Symbolic Interactions. Studying Virtual Math Teams, 99–140. Springer. | PDF |
| streng2009metaphor | Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Hussmann, H., & Fischer, F. (2009). Metaphor or diagram?: comparing different representations for group mirrors. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI '09. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: http://doi.acm.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1145/1738826.1738866. | PDF |
| streng2010measuring | Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Boring, S., B\”{o}hmSonja, Fischer, F., & Hussmann, H. (2010). Measuring effects of private and shared displays in small-group knowledge sharing processes. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi: http://doi.acm.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1145/1868914.1869030. | PDF |
| white2011distributed | White, T., & Pea, R. D. (2011). Distributed by Design: On the Promises and Pitfalls of Collaborative Learning with Multiple Representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 99999(1), 1–1. Routledge. | PDF |
| hmelo2011representational | Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Liu, L., & Chernobilsky, E. (2011). Representational tools for understanding complex computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Analyzing Interactions in CSCL, 83–106. Springer. | PDF |
| kolloffel2011comparing | Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H. S., & Jong, T. de. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International Journal of {Computer-Supported} Collaborative Learning. doi: 10.1007/s11412-011-9110-3. | PDF |
