| Hoppe & Gaßner, 2002Hoppe, H. U., & GaßnerK. (2002). Integrating collaborative concept mapping tools with group memory and retrieval functions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (716--725). | Hoppe, H. U., & GaßnerK. (2002). Integrating collaborative concept mapping tools with group memory and retrieval functions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (716–725). |
| Kunz & Rittel, 1970Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. W. J. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Citeseer. | Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. W. J. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Citeseer. |
| DeKoven, 1990DeKoven, B. (1990). Connected executives: a strategic communications plan. In . | DeKoven, B. (1990). Connected executives: a strategic communications plan. In . |
| Boland Jr, Tenkasi & Te'eni, 1994Boland Jr, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V., & Te'eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 456--475. | Boland Jr, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V., & Te'eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 456–475. |
Dervin, 1998Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of knowledge management, 2(2), 36--46.  | Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of knowledge management, 2(2), 36–46. |
| Bowker & Star, 2000Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. The MIT Press. | Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. The MIT Press. |
| Conklin, 2001Conklin, J. (2001). White Paper: Sense-Making and Knowledge Collaboration Tools. | Conklin, J. (2001). White Paper: Sense-Making and Knowledge Collaboration Tools. |
| Palus & Drath, 2001Palus, C. J., & Drath, W. H. (2001). Putting something in the middle: An approach to dialogue. Reflections, 3(2), 28--39. | Palus, C. J., & Drath, W. H. (2001). Putting something in the middle: An approach to dialogue. Reflections, 3(2), 28–39. |
| Buckingham Shum, Motta & Domingue, 2002Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., & Domingue, J. (2002). Augmenting design deliberation with compendium: The case of collaborative ontology design. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Facilitating Hypertext Collaborative Modelling in conjunction with ACM Hypertext Conference, Maryland. | Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., & Domingue, J. (2002). Augmenting design deliberation with compendium: The case of collaborative ontology design. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Facilitating Hypertext Collaborative Modelling in conjunction with ACM Hypertext Conference, Maryland. |
| Conklin, 2002Conklin, J. (2002). Making sense of fragmentary information: Compendium and the intelligence community. Napa: USA, CogNexus Institute. | Conklin, J. (2002). Making sense of fragmentary information: Compendium and the intelligence community. Napa: USA, CogNexus Institute. |
| Westcombe et al., 2002Westcombe, M., Pidd, M., Mackenzie, A., Warren, I., & Sommerville, S. (2002). Problem solving dialogue: Cognitive mapping and IBIS. | Westcombe, M., Pidd, M., Mackenzie, A., Warren, I., & Sommerville, S. (2002). Problem solving dialogue: Cognitive mapping and IBIS. |
| Kirschner, Buckingham Shum & Carr, 2003Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. | Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. |
| Conklin, 2003Conklin, J. (2003). Dialog Mapping: Reflections on. Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, 117. | Conklin, J. (2003). Dialog Mapping: Reflections on. Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, 117. |
| Voss & Schäfer, 2003Voss, A., & SchäferA. (2003). Beyond Workflow: Discourse Flows for Knowledge Conversion. In Proceedings of I-KNOW (337--343). | Voss, A., & SchäferA. (2003). Beyond Workflow: Discourse Flows for Knowledge Conversion. In Proceedings of I-KNOW (337–343). |
| Page et al., 2005Page, K., Michaelides, D., De Roure, D., Shadbolt, N., Chen-Burger, Y. H., Dalton, J., Potter, S., Tate, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Eisenstadt, M., & others. (2005). Collaboration in the Semantic Grid: a Basis for e-Learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(9), 881--904. | Page, K., Michaelides, D., De Roure, D., Shadbolt, N., Chen-Burger, Y. H., Dalton, J., Potter, S., Tate, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Eisenstadt, M., & others. (2005). Collaboration in the Semantic Grid: a Basis for e-Learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(9), 881–904. |
| Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. K. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. | Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. K. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. |
| Selvin & Buckingham Shum, 2005Selvin, A. M., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2005). Hypermedia as a productivity tool for doctoral research. New review of hypermedia and multimedia, 11(1), 91--101. | Selvin, A. M., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2005). Hypermedia as a productivity tool for doctoral research. New review of hypermedia and multimedia, 11(1), 91–101. |
| Buckingham Shum, 2006Buckingham Shum, S. (2006). Sensemaking on the pragmatic web: A hypermedia discourse perspective. | Buckingham Shum, S. (2006). Sensemaking on the pragmatic web: A hypermedia discourse perspective. |
| Munneke et al., 2006Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Discussing a wicked problem in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity, 197--208. | Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Discussing a wicked problem in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity, 197–208. |
| Conklin, 2006Conklin, J. (2006). Wicked problems & social complexity. Citeseer. | Conklin, J. (2006). Wicked problems & social complexity. Citeseer. |
| Mackenzie et al., 2006Mackenzie, A., Pidd, M., Rooksby, J., Sommerville, I., Warren, I., & Westcombe, M. (2006). Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 156--171. | Mackenzie, A., Pidd, M., Rooksby, J., Sommerville, I., Warren, I., & Westcombe, M. (2006). Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 156–171. |
| Park, 2006Park, J. (2006). Topic mapping: A view of the road ahead. Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape, 1--13. | Park, J. (2006). Topic mapping: A view of the road ahead. Charting the Topic Maps Research and Applications Landscape, 1–13. |
| Okada & Buckingham Shum, 2006Okada, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2006). Knowledge mapping with Compendium in academic research and online education. In 22nd ICDE World Conference (3--6). | Okada, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2006). Knowledge mapping with Compendium in academic research and online education. In 22nd ICDE World Conference (3–6). |
| Hoffmann, 2007Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2007). Logical argument mapping: a cognitive-change-based method for building common ground. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Pragmatic web (41--47). | Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2007). Logical argument mapping: a cognitive-change-based method for building common ground. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Pragmatic web (41–47). |
| Reed, Walton & Macagno, 2007Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 22(1), 87--109. | Reed, C., Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 22(1), 87–109. |
| Park, 2007Park, J. (2007). Just-In-Time Learning A Tool-builder’s Perspective. In Invited presentation to the Global HR Forum, Seoul, S. Korea. | Park, J. (2007). Just-In-Time Learning A Tool-builder’s Perspective. In Invited presentation to the Global HR Forum, Seoul, S. Korea. |
| Oh & Jonassen, 2007Oh, S., & Jonassen, Dh. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95--110. | Oh, S., & Jonassen, Dh. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95–110. |
| Hoffmann, 2008Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2008). Requirements for reflective argument visualization tools: a case for using validity as a normative standard. In Proceeding of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008 (196--203). | Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2008). Requirements for reflective argument visualization tools: a case for using validity as a normative standard. In Proceeding of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008 (196–203). |
| Pimentel, Fuks & Lucena, 2008Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & LucenaCarlos José Pereira. (2008). Linking to several messages for convergence: A case study in the AulaNet forum. Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 196--203. | Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & LucenaCarlos José Pereira. (2008). Linking to several messages for convergence: A case study in the AulaNet forum. Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 196–203. |
| Okada & Buckingham Shum, 2008Okada, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2008). Evidence-Based Dialogue Maps as a research tool to evaluate the quality of school pupils’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 291--315. | Okada, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2008). Evidence-Based Dialogue Maps as a research tool to evaluate the quality of school pupils’ scientific argumentation. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 291–315. |
| Selvin, 2008Selvin, A. M. (2008). Performing knowledge art: Understanding collaborative cartography. Knowledge Cartography, 223--247. | Selvin, A. M. (2008). Performing knowledge art: Understanding collaborative cartography. Knowledge Cartography, 223–247. |
| Park, 2008Park, J. (2008). Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge Federation. Proceedings Knowledge Federation. | Park, J. (2008). Knowledge Gardening as Knowledge Federation. Proceedings Knowledge Federation. |
| Hoffmann, 2008Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2008). Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica. | Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2008). Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica. |
| Okada, 2008Okada, A. (2008, September). Scaffolding School Pupils’ Scientific Argumentation with {Evidence-Based} Dialogue Maps. Book Chapter. | Okada, A. (2008, September). Scaffolding School Pupils’ Scientific Argumentation with {Evidence-Based} Dialogue Maps. Book Chapter. |
| Conklin, 2008Conklin, J. (2008). Growing a Global Issue Base: An Issue-based Approach to Policy Deliberation. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing. | Conklin, J. (2008). Growing a Global Issue Base: An Issue-based Approach to Policy Deliberation. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing. |
| De Moor, Park & Croitoru, 2009De Moor, A., Park, J., & Croitoru, M. (2009). Argumentation map generation with conceptual graphs: the case for essence. | De Moor, A., Park, J., & Croitoru, M. (2009). Argumentation map generation with conceptual graphs: the case for essence. |
| Tiropanis et al., 2009Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2009). Semantic Technologies for Learning and Teaching in the Web 2.0 era-A survey. | Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2009). Semantic Technologies for Learning and Teaching in the Web 2.0 era-A survey. |
| Poblet, Casanovas & Cobo, 2009Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., & Cobo, J. M. L. (2009). Linking the Semantic Web to ODR: the Ontomedia project. In (Vol. 2009). | Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., & Cobo, J. M. L. (2009). Linking the Semantic Web to ODR: the Ontomedia project. In (Vol. 2009). |
| Groza et al., 2009Groza, T., Handschuh, S., Breslin, J. G., & Decker, S. (2009). An Abstract Framework for Modeling Argumentation in Virtual Communities. Int. J. of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 1(3), 35--47. | Groza, T., Handschuh, S., Breslin, J. G., & Decker, S. (2009). An Abstract Framework for Modeling Argumentation in Virtual Communities. Int. J. of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 1(3), 35–47. |
| Rahwan et al., 2010Rahwan, I., Banihashemi, B., Reed, C., Walton, D., & Abdallah, S. (2010). Representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web. The Knowledge Engineering Review (to appear). | Rahwan, I., Banihashemi, B., Reed, C., Walton, D., & Abdallah, S. (2010). Representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web. The Knowledge Engineering Review (to appear). |
| Wyner & Engers, 2010Wyner, A., & van Engers, T. (2010). A framework for enriched, controlled on-line discussion forums for e-government policy-making. In Proceedings of eGov. | Wyner, A., & van Engers, T. (2010). A framework for enriched, controlled on-line discussion forums for e-government policy-making. In Proceedings of eGov. |
| Scheuer et al., 2010Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43-102. | Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43-102. |
| Schneider et al., 2010Schneider, J., Passant, A., Groza, T., & Breslin, J. G. (2010). Argumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments. In Proceeding of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (439--446). | Schneider, J., Passant, A., Groza, T., & Breslin, J. G. (2010). Argumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments. In Proceeding of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (439–446). |
| Park, 2010Park, J. (2010). Boundary Infrastructures for IBIS Federation: Design Rationale, Implementation, and Evaluation. | Park, J. (2010). Boundary Infrastructures for IBIS Federation: Design Rationale, Implementation, and Evaluation. |
| Park, 2011Park, J. (2011). Myelin Repair Foundation Game Analysis, Part. | Park, J. (2011). Myelin Repair Foundation Game Analysis, Part. |
| Karamanou, Loutas & Tarabanis, 2011Karamanou, A., Loutas, N., & Tarabanis, K. (2011). ArgVis: structuring political deliberations using innovative visualisation technologies. Electronic Participation, 87--98. | Karamanou, A., Loutas, N., & Tarabanis, K. (2011). ArgVis: structuring political deliberations using innovative visualisation technologies. Electronic Participation, 87–98. |
