| Scaife & Rogers, 1996Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work?. International journal of human-computer studies, 45(2), 185--213. | Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: how do graphical representations work?. International journal of human-computer studies, 45(2), 185–213. |
| Shipman & Marshall, 1999Shipman, F. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1999). Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(4), 333--352. | Shipman, F. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1999). Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(4), 333–352. |
Conklin et al., 2001Conklin, J., Selvin, A. M., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sierhuis, M. (2001). Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (123--124).  | Conklin, J., Selvin, A. M., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sierhuis, M. (2001). Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (123–124). |
| Bruggen, Kirschner & Jochems, 2002van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121--138. | van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138. |
| Buckingham Shum, 2003Buckingham Shum, S. (2003). The roots of computer supported argument visualization. In (3--24). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. | Buckingham Shum, S. (2003). The roots of computer supported argument visualization. In (3–24). London, UK: Springer-Verlag. |
| Suthers, 2005Suthers, D. D. (2005). {Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared Representations}. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5a--5a. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.151 | Suthers, D. D. (2005). {Collaborative Knowledge Construction through Shared Representations}. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5a–5a. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.151 |
| Lee & Kim, 2005Lee, M., & Kim, D. (2005). The effects of the collaborative representation supporting tool on problem-solving processes and outcomes in web-based collaborative problem-based learning (PBL) environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 273. | Lee, M., & Kim, D. (2005). The effects of the collaborative representation supporting tool on problem-solving processes and outcomes in web-based collaborative problem-based learning (PBL) environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 273. |
| Anderson et al., 2005Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., Prince, C., Su, J., Videon, F., & Wolfman, S. (2005). A study of diagrammatic ink in lecture. Computers \& Graphics, 29(4), 480--489. | Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., Prince, C., Su, J., Videon, F., & Wolfman, S. (2005). A study of diagrammatic ink in lecture. Computers \& Graphics, 29(4), 480–489. |
| Buckingham Shum et al., 2006Buckingham Shum, S., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Haley, C. B., & Nuseibeh, B. (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from {gIBIS} and {QOC}. In A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering (111-132). Book Chapter, Springer Verlag. | Buckingham Shum, S., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Haley, C. B., & Nuseibeh, B. (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from {gIBIS} and {QOC}. In A. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering (111-132). Book Chapter, Springer Verlag. |
| Slof et al., 2010Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1--20. | Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–20. |
| Liddo & Buckingham Shum, 2010Liddo, A. D., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2010, February). Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. Conference Item. | Liddo, A. D., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2010, February). Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. Conference Item. |
| Bell, 1997Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (10--19). | Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (10–19). |
| Hearst, 1999Hearst, M. A. (1999). User interfaces and visualization. Modern information retrieval, 257--323. | Hearst, M. A. (1999). User interfaces and visualization. Modern information retrieval, 257–323. |
| Soller, 2001Soller, A. (2001). Comprehensive Exam. | Soller, A. (2001). Comprehensive Exam. |
| Brna, Cox & Good, 2001Brna, P., Cox, R., & Good, J. (2001). Learning to think and communicate with diagrams: 14 questions to consider. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1), 115--134. | Brna, P., Cox, R., & Good, J. (2001). Learning to think and communicate with diagrams: 14 questions to consider. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1), 115–134. |
| Fischer & Mandl, 2002Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Facilitating knowledge convergence in videoconferencing environments: the role of external representation tools. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, CSCL '02 (623--624). International Society of the Learning Sciences. | Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Facilitating knowledge convergence in videoconferencing environments: the role of external representation tools. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, CSCL '02 (623–624). International Society of the Learning Sciences. |
| Toth, Suthers & Lesgold, 2002Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264--286. | Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286. |
| Puntambekar et al., 2002Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., Suthers, D. D., Hundhausen, C. D., & Hübscher-YoungerTeresa. (2002). External representations for collaborative learning and assessment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (714--715). | Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., Suthers, D. D., Hundhausen, C. D., & Hübscher-YoungerTeresa. (2002). External representations for collaborative learning and assessment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (714–715). |
| Fischer et al., 2002Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., GräselC., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213--232. | Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., GräselC., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. |
| Munneke, Amelsvoort & Andriessen, 2003Munneke, L., van Amelsvoort, M., & Andriessen, J. (2003). The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 113--131. | Munneke, L., van Amelsvoort, M., & Andriessen, J. (2003). The role of diagrams in collaborative argumentation-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 113–131. |
| Joiner & Jones, 2003Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International journal of educational research, 39(8), 861--871. | Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International journal of educational research, 39(8), 861–871. |
| Van Bruggen, 2003Van Bruggen, J. (2003). {Explorations in graphical argumentation: The use of external representations of argumentation in collaborative problem solving.} (PhD thesis). | Van Bruggen, J. (2003). {Explorations in graphical argumentation: The use of external representations of argumentation in collaborative problem solving.} (PhD thesis). |
| Carnot et al., 2003Carnot, M. J., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. | Carnot, M. J., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, J., & Novak, J. D. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. |
| Scardamalia, 2003Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge Society Network {(KSN):} Toward an expert society for democratizing knowledge. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 63–66. | Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge Society Network {(KSN):} Toward an expert society for democratizing knowledge. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 63–66. |
| Azevedo, Winters & Moos, 2004Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 215--245. | Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 215–245. |
| Victor, 2005Victor, B. (2005). Magic ink: Information software and the graphical interface. | Victor, B. (2005). Magic ink: Information software and the graphical interface. |
| Roschelle et al., 2005Roschelle, J., Schank, P., Brecht, J., Tatar, D., & Chaudhury, S. R. (2005). From response systems to distributed systems for enhanced collaborative learning. In Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences: Sharing Good Practices of Research, Experimentation and Innovation (363--370). | Roschelle, J., Schank, P., Brecht, J., Tatar, D., & Chaudhury, S. R. (2005). From response systems to distributed systems for enhanced collaborative learning. In Proceeding of the 2005 conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences: Sharing Good Practices of Research, Experimentation and Innovation (363–370). |
| Rienks, Heylen & Weijden, 2005Rienks, Rj., Heylen, Dkj., & van der Weijden, E. (2005). Argument diagramming of meeting conversations. | Rienks, Rj., Heylen, Dkj., & van der Weijden, E. (2005). Argument diagramming of meeting conversations. |
| Janssen et al., 2005Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., & Broeken, M. (2005). Effects of visualizing participation in computer-supported collaborative learning. | Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., & Broeken, M. (2005). Effects of visualizing participation in computer-supported collaborative learning. |
| Pinkwart, 2005Pinkwart, N. (2005). Collaborative modeling in graph based environments. Dissertation. de. | Pinkwart, N. (2005). Collaborative modeling in graph based environments. Dissertation. de. |
| Reimann et al., 2005Reimann, P., Judy, K., Yacef, K., & Goodyear, P. (2005). Adaptive visualisation support for self-managed learning groups. In AIED 2005--Workshop 6 Representing and Analyzing Collaborative Interactions: What works? When does it work? To what extent are methods re-usable? (81). | Reimann, P., Judy, K., Yacef, K., & Goodyear, P. (2005). Adaptive visualisation support for self-managed learning groups. In AIED 2005–Workshop 6 Representing and Analyzing Collaborative Interactions: What works? When does it work? To what extent are methods re-usable? (81). |
| Hoffmann, 2005Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Logical argument mapping: A method for overcoming cognitive problems of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 304--334. | Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Logical argument mapping: A method for overcoming cognitive problems of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 304–334. |
| Van Drie et al., 2005Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Using representational tools to support historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 25--41. | Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Using representational tools to support historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 25–41. |
| Drie et al., 2005van Drie, J., van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 575--602. | van Drie, J., van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 575–602. |
| Hundhausen, 2005Hundhausen, C. D. (2005). Using end-user visualization environments to mediate conversations: a [] Communicative Dimensions' framework. Journal of Visual Languages \& Computing, 16(3), 153--185. | Hundhausen, C. D. (2005). Using end-user visualization environments to mediate conversations: a [] Communicative Dimensions' framework. Journal of Visual Languages \& Computing, 16(3), 153–185. |
| Ertl, Fischer & Mandl, 2006Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers \& Education, 47(3), 298--315. | Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers \& Education, 47(3), 298–315. |
| Pinkwart et al., 2006Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2006). Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (227--236). | Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., & Lynch, C. (2006). Toward legal argument instruction with graph grammars and collaborative filtering techniques. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (227–236). |
| Rbeiz, 2006Rbeiz, M. A. (2006). Semantic representation of digital ink in the classroom learning partner (PhD thesis). | Rbeiz, M. A. (2006). Semantic representation of digital ink in the classroom learning partner (PhD thesis). |
| Novick, 2006Novick, L. R. (2006). Understanding spatial diagram structure: An analysis of hierarchies, matrices, and networks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(10), 1826--1856. | Novick, L. R. (2006). Understanding spatial diagram structure: An analysis of hierarchies, matrices, and networks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(10), 1826–1856. |
| Braak & Vreeswijk, 2006van den Braak, S. W., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2006). AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In Proceeding of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (151--156). | van den Braak, S. W., & Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2006). AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In Proceeding of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (151–156). |
| Andriessen, 2006Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge University Press. | Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge University Press. |
| Suthers, 2006Suthers, D. D. (2006). {A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations}. RPTEL, 1(2), 1--25. | Suthers, D. D. (2006). {A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations}. RPTEL, 1(2), 1–25. |
| Reed & Rowe, 2007Reed, C., & Rowe, G. (2007). A pluralist approach to argument diagramming. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4), 59--85. | Reed, C., & Rowe, G. (2007). A pluralist approach to argument diagramming. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4), 59–85. |
| Amelsvoort, Andriessen & Kanselaar, 2007van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 485--521. | van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 485–521. |
| Nussbaum et al., 2007Nussbaum, E. M., Winsor, D. L., Aqui, Y. M., & Poliquin, A. M. (2007). Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 479--500. | Nussbaum, E. M., Winsor, D. L., Aqui, Y. M., & Poliquin, A. M. (2007). Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 479–500. |
| Lund et al., 2007Lund, K., MolinariGaëlle, SéjournéA., & Baker, M. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 273--295. | Lund, K., MolinariGaëlle, SéjournéA., & Baker, M. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 273–295. |
| Gao et al., 2007Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A Review of Studies on Collaborative Concept Mapping: What Have We Learned About the Technique and What Is Next?. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479. | Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A Review of Studies on Collaborative Concept Mapping: What Have We Learned About the Technique and What Is Next?. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479. |
| Easterday, Aleven & Scheines, 2007Easterday, M. W., Aleven, V., & Scheines, R. (2007). 'Tis Better to Construct than to Receive? The Effects of Diagram Tools on Causal Reasoning. In Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work (93--100). | Easterday, M. W., Aleven, V., & Scheines, R. (2007). 'Tis Better to Construct than to Receive? The Effects of Diagram Tools on Causal Reasoning. In Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work (93–100). |
| Verheij, 2007Verheij, B. (2007). Argumentation support software: boxes-and-arrows and beyond. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4), 187--208. | Verheij, B. (2007). Argumentation support software: boxes-and-arrows and beyond. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4), 187–208. |
| Reed & Grasso, 2007Reed, C., & Grasso, F. (2007). Recent advances in computational models of natural argument. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(1), 1--15. | Reed, C., & Grasso, F. (2007). Recent advances in computational models of natural argument. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(1), 1–15. |
| Avramides, 2007Avramides, K. (2007). Students' Conception of Knowledge and Its Link to Knowledge Monitoring in Ill-Structured Subjects: The Potential of Representational Tools to Support Learning. In Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work (681--682). | Avramides, K. (2007). Students' Conception of Knowledge and Its Link to Knowledge Monitoring in Ill-Structured Subjects: The Potential of Representational Tools to Support Learning. In Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work (681–682). |
| Avramides & Luckin, 2007Avramides, K., & Luckin, R. (2007). Towards the Design of A Representational Tool To Scaffold Students’ Epistemic Understanding of Psychology in Higher Education. | Avramides, K., & Luckin, R. (2007). Towards the Design of A Representational Tool To Scaffold Students’ Epistemic Understanding of Psychology in Higher Education. |
| Hieronymi et al., 2007Hieronymi, M., Wichmann, A., Kuhn, M., & Hoppe, H. U. (2007). Pen based Tools for Sudoku Solving-a Case for Representational Flexibility?. In Pen-Based Learning Technologies, 2007. PLT 2007. First International Workshop on (1--6). | Hieronymi, M., Wichmann, A., Kuhn, M., & Hoppe, H. U. (2007). Pen based Tools for Sudoku Solving-a Case for Representational Flexibility?. In Pen-Based Learning Technologies, 2007. PLT 2007. First International Workshop on (1–6). |
| Ashley et al., 2007Ashley, K., Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., & Aleven, V. (2007). Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (271--275). | Ashley, K., Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., & Aleven, V. (2007). Learning by diagramming Supreme Court oral arguments. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (271–275). |
| Schneider, Voigt & Betz, 2007Schneider, D. C., Voigt, C., & Betz, G. (2007). ArguNet—a software tool for collaborative argumentation analysis and research. In 7th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA VII). | Schneider, D. C., Voigt, C., & Betz, G. (2007). ArguNet—a software tool for collaborative argumentation analysis and research. In 7th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA VII). |
| Dwyer, 2007Dwyer, N. (2007). Incorporating indexicality and contingency into the design of representations for computer-mediated collaboration (PhD thesis). | Dwyer, N. (2007). Incorporating indexicality and contingency into the design of representations for computer-mediated collaboration (PhD thesis). |
| Graber, 2007Graber, G. (2007). Open-Source Argumentation: A Flexible System Design. | Graber, G. (2007). Open-Source Argumentation: A Flexible System Design. |
| Bouyias, Demetriadis & Tsoukalas, 2008Bouyias, Y. N., Demetriadis, S. N., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2008). iArgue: A web-based argumentation system supporting collaboration scripts with adaptable fading. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (477--479). | Bouyias, Y. N., Demetriadis, S. N., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2008). iArgue: A web-based argumentation system supporting collaboration scripts with adaptable fading. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (477–479). |
| Pinkwart et al., 2008Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., Ashley, K., & Aleven, V. (2008). Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (90--100). | Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., Ashley, K., & Aleven, V. (2008). Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills?. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (90–100). |
| Medina & Suthers, 2008Medina, R., & Suthers, D. D. (2008). {Bringing Representational Practice From Log to Light Case Study}. Science, 1--8. | Medina, R., & Suthers, D. D. (2008). {Bringing Representational Practice From Log to Light Case Study}. Science, 1–8. |
| Amelsvoort, Andriessen & Kanselaar, 2008van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1293--1313. | van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1293–1313. |
| Lynch et al., 2008Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K., & Aleven, V. (2008). What do argument diagrams tell us about students’ aptitude or experience? a statistical analysis in an ill-defined domain. Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains., 56. | Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K., & Aleven, V. (2008). What do argument diagrams tell us about students’ aptitude or experience? a statistical analysis in an ill-defined domain. Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains., 56. |
| Stasko, Görg & Liu, 2008Stasko, J., GörgC., & Liu, Z. (2008). Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7(2), 118--132. | Stasko, J., GörgC., & Liu, Z. (2008). Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization, 7(2), 118–132. |
| Yi et al., 2008Yi, J. S., Kang, Y., Stasko, J. T., & Jacko, J. A. (2008). Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization?. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization (4). | Yi, J. S., Kang, Y., Stasko, J. T., & Jacko, J. A. (2008). Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization?. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization (4). |
| Medina & Suthers, 2009Medina, R., & Suthers, D. D. (2009). Using a contingency graph to discover representational practices in an online collaborative environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3). | Medina, R., & Suthers, D. D. (2009). Using a contingency graph to discover representational practices in an online collaborative environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(3). |
| Streng et al., 2009Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Hussmann, H., & Fischer, F. (2009). Metaphor or diagram?: comparing different representations for group mirrors. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI '09 (249--256). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1738826.1738866 | Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Hussmann, H., & Fischer, F. (2009). Metaphor or diagram?: comparing different representations for group mirrors. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI '09 (249–256). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1738826.1738866 |
| Waard et al., 2009de Waard, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Carusi, A., Park, J., Samwald, M., & SándorÁ. (2009). Hypotheses, evidence and relationships: The HypER approach for representing scientific knowledge claims. | de Waard, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Carusi, A., Park, J., Samwald, M., & SándorÁ. (2009). Hypotheses, evidence and relationships: The HypER approach for representing scientific knowledge claims. |
| Suthers, Dwyer & Vatrapu, 2009Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., & Vatrapu, R. (2009). CollabReps: A Research Prototype for Studying Representational Guidance in Computer Supported Intercultural Collaboration. | Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., & Vatrapu, R. (2009). CollabReps: A Research Prototype for Studying Representational Guidance in Computer Supported Intercultural Collaboration. |
| Cakir, 2009Cakir, M. P. (2009). The Organization of Graphical, Narrative and Symbolic Interactions. Studying Virtual Math Teams, 99--140. | Cakir, M. P. (2009). The Organization of Graphical, Narrative and Symbolic Interactions. Studying Virtual Math Teams, 99–140. |
| Lynch et al., 2009Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Pinkwart, N., & Aleven, V. (2009). Computational Argument as a Diagnostic Tool: The role of reliability. In Proceedings of the Fall Symposium on The Uses of Computational Argumentation, Washington DC, USA. AAAI. | Lynch, C., Ashley, K. D., Pinkwart, N., & Aleven, V. (2009). Computational Argument as a Diagnostic Tool: The role of reliability. In Proceedings of the Fall Symposium on The Uses of Computational Argumentation, Washington DC, USA. AAAI. |
| Erkens, Janssen & Kirschner, 2010Erkens, G., Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Visualization of argumentation as shared activity. Use of Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving. Analysis and Improvement, 242--260. | Erkens, G., Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Visualization of argumentation as shared activity. Use of Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving. Analysis and Improvement, 242–260. |
| Haugwitz, Nesbit & Sandmann, 2010Haugwitz, M., Nesbit, J. C., & Sandmann, A. (2010). Cognitive ability and the instructional efficacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 536--543. | Haugwitz, M., Nesbit, J. C., & Sandmann, A. (2010). Cognitive ability and the instructional efficacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 536–543. |
| Rosen, 2010Rosen, M. A. (2010). Collaborative problem solving: The role of team knowledge building processes and external representations (PhD thesis). | Rosen, M. A. (2010). Collaborative problem solving: The role of team knowledge building processes and external representations (PhD thesis). |
| Janssen et al., 2010Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional science, 38(1), 59--88. | Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional science, 38(1), 59–88. |
| Streng et al., 2010Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Boring, S., B\"{o}hmSonja, Fischer, F., & Hussmann, H. (2010). Measuring effects of private and shared displays in small-group knowledge sharing processes. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI '10 (789--792). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1868914.1869030 | Streng, S., Stegmann, K., Boring, S., B\”{o}hmSonja, Fischer, F., & Hussmann, H. (2010). Measuring effects of private and shared displays in small-group knowledge sharing processes. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI '10 (789–792). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1868914.1869030 |
| Gurkan et al., 2010Gurkan, A., Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2010). Mediating debate through on-line large-scale argumentation: Evidence from the field. Information Sciences, 180(19), 3686--3702. | Gurkan, A., Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2010). Mediating debate through on-line large-scale argumentation: Evidence from the field. Information Sciences, 180(19), 3686–3702. |
| Bischof, Comi & Eppler, 2011Bischof, N., Comi, A., & Eppler, M. J. (2011). Knowledge Visualization in Qualitative Methods--Or How Can I See What I Say?. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2011 15th International Conference on (371--376). | Bischof, N., Comi, A., & Eppler, M. J. (2011). Knowledge Visualization in Qualitative Methods–Or How Can I See What I Say?. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2011 15th International Conference on (371–376). |
| Eppler, 2011Eppler, M. J. (2011). What is an Effective Knowledge Visualization? Insights from a Review of Seminal Concepts. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2011 15th International Conference on (349--354). | Eppler, M. J. (2011). What is an Effective Knowledge Visualization? Insights from a Review of Seminal Concepts. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2011 15th International Conference on (349–354). |
| Deng, Zhang & Zhou, 2011Deng, S., Zhang, P., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Turning Unstructured and Incoherent Group Discussion into DATree: A TBL Coherence Analysis Approach. | Deng, S., Zhang, P., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Turning Unstructured and Incoherent Group Discussion into DATree: A TBL Coherence Analysis Approach. |
| Hoffmann, 2011Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2011). Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica, 2011(186), 189--212. | Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2011). Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica, 2011(186), 189–212. |
| Nussbaum, 2011Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84--106. | Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84–106. |
| Slof, 2011Slof, B. (2011). Representational scripting for carrying out complex learning tasks. | Slof, B. (2011). Representational scripting for carrying out complex learning tasks. |
| Hmelo-Silver et al., 2011Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Liu, L., & Chernobilsky, E. (2011). Representational tools for understanding complex computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Analyzing Interactions in CSCL, 83--106. | Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Liu, L., & Chernobilsky, E. (2011). Representational tools for understanding complex computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Analyzing Interactions in CSCL, 83–106. |
| White & Pea, 2011White, T., & Pea, R. D. (2011). Distributed by Design: On the Promises and Pitfalls of Collaborative Learning with Multiple Representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 99999(1), 1--1. | White, T., & Pea, R. D. (2011). Distributed by Design: On the Promises and Pitfalls of Collaborative Learning with Multiple Representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 99999(1), 1–1. |
| Sullivan et al., 2011Sullivan, F. R., Hamilton, C. E., Allessio, D. A., Boit, R. J., Deschamps, A. D., Sindelar, T., Vargas Ramos, G. E., Randall, A., Wilson, N., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Representational guidance and student engagement: examining designs for collaboration in online synchronous environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1--26. | Sullivan, F. R., Hamilton, C. E., Allessio, D. A., Boit, R. J., Deschamps, A. D., Sindelar, T., Vargas Ramos, G. E., Randall, A., Wilson, N., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Representational guidance and student engagement: examining designs for collaboration in online synchronous environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–26. |
| Kolloffel, Eysink & Jong, 2011Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International Journal of {Computer-Supported} Collaborative Learning. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9110-3 | Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International Journal of {Computer-Supported} Collaborative Learning. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9110-3 |
