| Slof et al., 2010Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1--20. | Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Jaspers, J. (2010). Design and effects of representational scripting on group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–20. |
| Land & Zembal-Saul, 2003Land, S., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 65--84. | Land, S., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 65–84. |
| Xun & Land, 2004Xun, Ge., & Land, S. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22. | Xun, Ge., & Land, S. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22. |
| Kapur & Kinzer, 2007Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 439--459. | Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 439–459. |
| Zhang et al., 2007Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145. | Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145. |
| Azevedo et al., 2008Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45--72. | Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72. |
| Ke & Hoadley, 2009Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. M. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 487--510. | Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. M. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 487–510. |
| Zhang, 2010Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229--243. | Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243. |
| Sullivan et al., 2011Sullivan, F. R., Hamilton, C. E., Allessio, D. A., Boit, R. J., Deschamps, A. D., Sindelar, T., Vargas Ramos, G. E., Randall, A., Wilson, N., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Representational guidance and student engagement: examining designs for collaboration in online synchronous environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1--26. | Sullivan, F. R., Hamilton, C. E., Allessio, D. A., Boit, R. J., Deschamps, A. D., Sindelar, T., Vargas Ramos, G. E., Randall, A., Wilson, N., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Representational guidance and student engagement: examining designs for collaboration in online synchronous environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–26. |
