A Study of At-Risk High School Students' Calibration Accuracy, Self-Efficacy, and Use of Assessment Results
Hunter SUNY
- Purposes
- Using experimental design, examining at-rish hish school students SRL practices and behaviour
- Document changes in students' self-efficacy beliefs and metacognitive ability to calibrate
Context
- Requirement of HS graduation - NY centralized exam
- often fail
- integrated algebra
- living environment
- Intensive 5-week summer program
- daily instruction & tutoring, weekly practice examinations
Intervention
- After weekly practice exam results, provide feedback to experimental group
- performance feedback, task-specific and global
- self-efficacy feedback, task-specific and global
Theoretical framework
- Academic self-regulated learning SRL (Zimmerman cyclical model)
- Self-efficacy (Bandur, Schunk & Meece)
- Calibration accuracy
- Formative feedback
RQs
- Did experimental/control group change self-reports SRL strategy use?
- Effect of treatment on calibration accuracy?
- Effect of treatment on self-efficacy beliefs?
- Change over time w/in experimental group
- Become more accurate in calibration from week to week
- Increase self-efficacy beliefs
- Perception of usefulness of feedback to
- change how they studied
- …
Measures
- Self-regulated learning survey
- Self-efficacy ratings
- perceived global self-efficacy
- task-specific sefl-efficacy
- Calibration accuracy
- computed based on comparison of predicted practice exam and actual score
- Usefulness of feedback
Self-assessment
- opportunities to engage in self-monitoring of studying practices and performance are valuable
- need to examine more deeply what kinds of information are most useful to help at-risk students self-monitor